首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison between shot peening and abrasive blasting processes as deposition methods for hydroxyapatite coatings onto a titanium alloy
【2h】

Comparison between shot peening and abrasive blasting processes as deposition methods for hydroxyapatite coatings onto a titanium alloy

机译:喷丸强化和喷砂工艺之间的比较作为钛合金上羟基磷灰石涂层的沉积方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent studies have shown that combining a compressed air jet with entrained hydroxyapatite(HA) particles with a jet of abrasive particles can be used to deposit a well adhered crystallineHA coatings onto titanium substrates. A similar particle bombardment process utilising aflow of shot peen particles and a flow of suitable powder particles has been used to deposit arange of coatings, though the deposition of bioceramic powders have not yet been reported bythis method. In this study a direct comparison between the shot peen and abrasivebombardment processes has been undertaken to determine which technique yields coatingsexhibiting higher levels of adhesion on titanium alloy substrates. Both processes were shownto effectively deposit a layer of crystalline apatite onto the titanium substrates over a range ofpressures and jet to substrate heights. It was observed that for both processes that an increasein particle kinetic energy producing corresponding enhancements in both deposition rate andsurface roughness. The shot peen process however produced a smooth layer of laminarapatite, which was readily removed from the surface using a scratch adhesion test technique.In contrast the combination of a jet of HA and abrasive powders resulted in an increase insurface abrasion and increased mechanical interlocking of the HA into the metal surface wasobserved. The mechano-chemical affect achieved resulted in a better adhered HA layer. Thesurface morphology obtained using the two treatments was significantly different with anincrease in the average roughness (Ra) of ≈ 70 and 80 % for samples treated with abrasiveparticles over shot peen. This difference in surface treatment is further highlighted by theremoval of the HA using an acid etch. The roughness (Ra) of the underlying titanium layerafter this removal is, on average, >175 % higher for the surface treated with the abrasiveparticles during HA deposition.
机译:最近的研究表明,结合使用带有夹带的羟基磷灰石(HA)颗粒的压缩空气射流和磨料颗粒射流,可以将粘附良好的结晶HA涂层沉积到钛基底上。尽管没有通过这种方法报道过生物陶瓷粉末的沉积,但是已经采用了类似的利用喷喷颗粒的流动和合适的粉末颗粒的流动进行的轰击方法来沉积一系列涂料。在这项研究中,直接进行了喷丸和轰击工艺之间的直接比较,以确定哪种技术可以产生在钛合金基材上具有更高附着力的涂料。两种工艺均显示在一定压力范围内并喷射至基材高度时,可将有效的结晶磷灰石层有效地沉积在钛基材上。观察到,对于两种方法,颗粒动能的增加都会在沉积速率和表面粗糙度上产生相应的增强。然而,喷丸工艺产生了一层光滑的层状磷灰石层,该层可以通过划痕附着力测试技术轻松地从表面上去除。相反,HA喷射流和磨料粉末的组合导致表面磨损增加,并且机械磨损性增加。观察到HA进入金属表面。所获得的机械化学影响导致了更好的粘附HA层。两次喷丸处理后的样品经两次喷丸处理后,其平均表面粗糙度(Ra)分别增加了约70%和80%,这两种处理所获得的表面形态显着不同。表面处理中的这种差异通过使用酸蚀刻去除HA而进一步突出。在HA沉积期间,用磨料颗粒处理的表面,在去除之后,下面的钛层的粗糙度(Ra)平均平均高出> 175%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号